COMMISSION GORILLA v2

Ultimate Affiliate Promotion, Review and Bonus Page Builder - Try it out for a full 14 Days for Just $1!

U.S. House approves remote voting, though the tech is unclear

Congress will allow remote voting for the first time in its history, after the U.S. House approved Resolution 965 late Friday in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

The measure — sponsored by Massachusetts Representative Jim McGovern — grants proxy voting by members for renewable a time period of 45 periods and allows for remote participation in committee hearings.

H.R. 965 could also permanently alter the road Congress controls through a provision that establishes a bi-partisan process to explore digital voting away from Capitol Hill.

Per the directive,” The chair of the Committee on House Administration, in consultation with the higher-ranking minority representative, shall study the feasibility of using technology to conduct remote voting in the House, and shall provide certification…that operable and ensuring technology exists .”

Previous House governs required in person voting only. The Senate still spawns decisions by recording verbal “Yeas” and “Nays” on a tally sheet.

Friday’s congressional action is another example of how COVID-1 9 is forcing every organization in the U.S. to modernise longstanding ways of doing things, usually through a mixture of digital tools.

We still don’t have clear details on what tech the U.S. House will use to implement both the short and longer term provisions of H.R. 965.

The proxy voting layout will allow members to vote remotely through designated representatives on Capitol Hill — effectively a kind of pinch-hitting for Congress. For remote participation in hearings, there are a range of options that could be selected — from Google Meet to Microsoft Teams. Last week, Dr. Anthony Fauci testified before the U.S. Senate using Zoom.

On determining long-term means for remote voting, that’s now up to the Chairperson of the Committee on House Administration — representative Zoe Lofgren( D-CA) — and the standing minority representative Rodney Davis( R-IL ), who voted against H.R. 965.

Lofgren offered a preview of how it could shape up in a statement supporting H.R. 965 late Friday:” For voting time the storey, we will rely on a procure email system, coupled with member-driven, remotely-directed authorizations. This method would use assure email for proxy elects: a solid, was aware, pliable engineering with very low bandwidth requirements that we understand very well from a cybersecurity position .”

Of course, she and Republican Congressman Davis will have to find agreement on this during a hour when both parties rarely agree on anything. The vote on H.R. 965 was split along party line, with 217 Dems electing in favor and not a single Republican representative supporting the measure.

Why Congress isn’t working remotely due to COVID-1 9

In the past, Congress has fought calls to allow for remote voting. There was its further consideration of the need for such provisions after the September 11 onrushes and 2001 Anthrax attempts.These was overridden by a long time expectation that those elected to represent constituencies be physically present to vote.

Over the last two months, it saw the House might become a last holdout in the U.S. for in person only workplaces, as much of the country has shifted to tech-enabled measures for remote operations.

Shortly after the coronavirus eruption touched the U.S. in March, Congressman Eric Swalwell( D-CA) pulped a resolution with Arkansas Representative Rick Crawford( R-AR) that would allow members to participate practically in hearings and vote remotely, under special circumstances.

US capitol building at night

Image Credits: Bill Dickinson/ Getty Images

That was nixed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who, at the time, required Congress to remain in session and present to pass the first coronavirus stimulus bill.

Two months and nearly one hundred thousand American extinctions last-minute, it looms COVID-1 9 could thrust one of the more significant procedural the changing nature of the House’s 231 time history.

In person voting could soon be replaced with some formation of two-factor authentication, digital voting. This could change longstanding patterns for how lawmakers hasten, treated with constituencies, and segment their age between the Beltway and regions back home.

Read more: feedproxy.google.com

No Luck
No prize
Get Software
Almost!
Free E-Book
Missed Out
No Prize
No luck today
Almost!
Free eCourse
No prize
Enter Our Draw
Get your chance to win a prize!
Enter your email address and spin the wheel. This is your chance to win amazing discounts!
Our in-house rules:
  • One game per user
  • Cheaters will be disqualified.