There are, however, other provisions that could also have serious implications for the technology and media macrocosms. For one thing, the statute includes a proposal from Senator Thom Tillis( a Republican from North Carolina) that would make illegal streaming for profit a trespas( rather than simply a misdemeanor ), with penalties of up to 10 years of imprisonment.
When Tillis released a draft of his proposal earlier this month, the open internet/ intellectual property nonprofit Public Knowledge released a statement arguing that there’s no need” for further criminal penalties for copyright violation ,” but also saying that the greenback is” narrowly tailor-make and escapes criminalizing users” and” does not criminalize streamers who may include unlicensed cultivates as part of their series” — instead, it focuses on those who pirate for commercial-grade gain.
The bill also includes the CASE Act, which creates a new Copyright Claims Board within the U.S. Copyright Office. This system has been compared to small-time assertions courtroom, with the ability to adjudicate copyright claims and order fees of up to $30,000.
When the House of Representatives was debating the CASE Act last year, proponents represented it as giving independent creators an easier style to prosecute copyright infringement claims, while groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation said it could have a negative impact on individual internet users. Techdirt’s Mike Masnick argued yesterday that it will” supercharge copyright trolling accurately at a time when we need to fix the law to have less trolling .”
Now that the House and Senate have approved the bill, it’s going to President Donald Trump for his signature. Since the full text was only exhausted yesterday, we can probably expect slew more debate over its suggests in the weeks and months to come.
Update: Senator Tillis also issued a press statement noting that the legislation was co-led by Senator Patrick Leahy( a Democrat from Vermont) and emphasizing that it will only apply to” business, for-profit streaming piracy business .”
” The switch toward streaming content online has resulted in criminal streaming services illegally administering copyrighted fabric that costs the U.S. economy virtually $30 billion every year, and hinders the production of innovative content that Americans enjoy, ” Tillis said in a statement. “I am proud this commonsense legislation that was drafted with the input of founders, customer radicals, and technological sciences companionships will become law so we can target criminal organizations and ensure that no individual streamer has to worry about the fear of prosecution .”
Read more: feedproxy.google.com