Viral Cash Machine

Get more info at

Study associates frequency, quality of monthly reports with startup success

” Despite a lot of advertising and social media, number of sign-ups were modest ,” reads one of the last monthly reports I sent to my VCs before my startup ceased to exist.” After the initial tide, sign-ups have hindered right down to near pre-launch status. User acquisition is our number-one priority and my biggest headache .”

Like, I suspect, many other early-stage founders, I hated the monthly work of writing a short report for investors. We employed the PPP format( progress, both problems and means) for these regular missives, but progress was almost always slow-witted and the majority of cases, difficulties far outstripped plans.

On good months, I was far more motivated to file our monthly report — it is a very human thing to want to deliver good report — and on bad months I had a million other more important things I visualized a CEO should be spending their experience on.

However, according to a research conducted by Jan Luca Ernst, a masters student at The University of St. Gallen, I may have been misguided. In his thesis, supported by Prof. Dr. Elgar Fleisch( Professor of Technology Management at University of St. Gallen) and Florian Schweitzer( a partner at VC firm btov ), he writes” startups that submit regular, high-quality reports are shown by the statistics to be better financings than other startups .”

The research was based on analysis of hundreds of monthly startup reports submitted to btov Partners by portfolio fellowships out of its first two monies, which led between 2006 to 2014. Solely, researchers looked at 64 startups, treating the implementation of its startups during the course of its first two years after initial investment from the first fund, and the performance during a single time, 2015, for the second fund.

” Hypotheses on the positive effects of monthly startup reports were tested, use various multivariate regressions ,” write the paper’s writers.” As a reaction, various initial hypothesis were discarded .”

For example, the punctuality of startup reports did not appear to indicate whether a startup would be more successful. In contrast, the frequency of the submission of reports( at a confidence grade of 95% ), as well as the quality of the reporting( at a confidence stage of 99% ), were identified as sponsors to success.

” Overall, the findings emphasize the importance of the post-investment phase and the value added by venture capitalists beyond financing support ,” say Ernst, Fleisch and Schweitzer.” One central inference of the findings has an impact on subsequent investment rounds. Startups that refer regular, high-quality reports are shown by the statistics to be better financings than other startups. This may be an indicator that vindicates further asset, that, in turn, leads to better performance .”

The generators also suggest that, in the future, investors may ask for” full, unfiltered access” to all past reporting of a startup, including indication on the quality of reports and regularity of submission.” This would increase transparency and therefore eventually lead to better investment decision making ,” they write.

With that said, during a announcement with btov’s Florian Schweitzer, he conceded that correlation doesn’t necessarily mean lawsuit, but argued that there are many softer, and sometimes hidden, positive outcomes from monthly reports — especially when a founder does them candidly and entire heartedly.

Extra Crunch: What should a monthly report contain?

Florian Schweitzer: We always define what we would like or what we review “wouldve been” sensible, because for each startup, of course, it is different. In general, the idea is that the founders can do the report in half an hour. Generally, it contains something like eight KPIs, and then some bullet extents indicating on what went well, and what are the challenges right now. And those challenges are a superb opportunity to understand where the founder is struggling, and where we can support them. So it can be a terribly, very productive agenda for a discussion, which we often have regularity.

I think it is very good that founders sit back and think for half an hour: what happened during the last 30 daytimes? What did I want to achieve? What did I not achieve? And to be honest about the progress and challenges.

Read more:

No Luck
No prize
Get Software
Free E-Book
Missed Out
No Prize
No luck today
Free eCourse
No prize
Enter Our Draw
Get your chance to win a prize!
Enter your email address and spin the wheel. This is your chance to win amazing discounts!
Our in-house rules:
  • One game per user
  • Cheaters will be disqualified.