Mind uploading: Can we become immortal?
Watch the newest video from Big Think: https :// bigth.ink/ NewVideo
Learn skills from the world’s top subconscious at Big Think Edge: https :// bigth.ink/ Edge
Technology has derived to a part where humans have overridden natural selection. So what the hell is our categories become? Immortal interstellar travelers, perhaps.
Scientists are currently mapping the human brain in an effort to understand the connections that cause consciousness. If we can re-create consciousness, your thought can live on forever. You could even laser-port your consciousness to different planets at the speed of light, download your judgment into a local avatar and explore those worlds.
But is this transhumanist imagination of the future real or is it a pipedream? And if it is real, is it wise? Join theoretical physicist Michio Kaku, neuroscientist David Eagleman, human carry-on investigate Steven Kotler, skeptic Michael Shermer, culture theorist Douglas Rushkoff and futurist Jason Silva.
Read Michio Kaku’s diary “The Future of the Mind: The Scientific Quest to Understand, Enhance, and Empower the Mind” at https :// amzn.to/ 3mjVGtA
JASON SILVA: Transhumanism is essentially the philosophical school of thought that says that human beings should use engineering to transcend their limitations. That it’s perfectly natural for us to use our implements to overcome our borders, to extend our spirits, to extend our mindware using these technological scaffolds. The craziness here is that we’re finding more and more that our technological systems are mirroring some of the more advanced natural organisations in nature. You know, the internet is wired like the neurons in our ability, which is cabled like computer modelings of twilight topic in the universe. They all are the same intertwingled filamental organization. What does this tell us? That there is no distinction between the accept and the made. All of it is nature, all of it is us. So to be human is to be transhuman.
But the reason we’re at a pivotal point in biography is because now we’ve decommissioned natural selection. You know, this notion that we are now the honcho agents of evolution, right? We now get to decide who we become. We’re talking about software that writes its own hardware, life itself, the brand-new canvas for the master. Nanotechnology patterning matter, programmable thing. The whole world becomes computable, life itself, programmable, upgradable. What does this say about what it means to be human? It means that what it is to be human is to transform and transcend; we’ve always done it. We’re not the same categories we were 100,000 years ago. We’re not going to be the same categories tomorrow. Craig Venter recently said we’ve got to understand that we are a software-driven species. Change the application, reformed the genus. And why shouldn’t we?
DAVID EAGLEMAN: All the slice and parts of your intelligence, this vastly involved system of neurons–almost 100 billion neurons, each of which has 10,000 a link with its neighbors. So we’re talking a thousand trillion neurons. It’s a structure of such intricacy that it bankrupts our lingo but, fundamentally, it’s only three pounds and we’ve got it cornered and it’s right there and it’s a physical arrangement. The computational hypothesis of brain function suggests that the physical wetware isn’t the stuff that matters. It’s what are the algorithms that are running on top of the wetware? In other paroles, what is the brain actually doing? What’s it implementing, software-wise? Hypothetically, we are to take the physical stuff of the psyche and reproduce what it’s doing. In other utterances, procreate its software on other substrates. So we could make your psyche and reproduction it out of beer cans and tennis missiles and it would still run just fine. And if we said, “Hey, how are you feeling in there? ” This beer-can-tennis-ball machine would say, “Oh, I’m feeling fine, it’s a little cold, ” or whatever.
It’s likewise hypothetically a likelihood that we are able follow your ability and simulate it in silica, which signifies on a computer, in zeros and ones, actually feed the simulation of your brain.
MICHIO KAKU: The initial steps are once again being moved. At Caltech, for example, they’ve been able to take a mouse brain and look at a certain part of the brain where memories are treated. Reminiscence are treated at the awfully hub of our brain and they’ve been able to duplicate the functions of that with a chip. So, again, this does not mean that we can encode memories with a microchip, but it does mean that we’ve been able to make the information storage of a mouse mentality and have a silicon chip duplicate those functions. And so was mouse consciousness created in the process? I don’t know. I don’t know …
Read the full record at https :// bigthink.com/ videos/ can-humans-be-immortal
Read more: youtube.com