Share on Twitter
Quill Robinson is the American Conservation Coalition‘s vice president of government things.
President Joe Biden has pledged to cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030. He intends to meet this ambitious target through a gesticulate of brand-new federal spending and government programs.
But our best hope for reducing carbon emissions isn’t brand-new government spending. It’s a technological sea change — one that can only come from the private sector.
In fact, the government is slowing progress against climate change impacts by levy regulations that foreclose emissions-lowering technologies from contacting the market. If our commanders certainly want to save the planet, they need to get out of the nature of inventors who can actually do so.
One would expect the government to embrace technology with the potential to cut carbon pollution. After all, Biden himself has pledged to” spur American technological innovations” as one of the purposes of his environment agenda.
Unfortunately, some of the most promising green tech breakthroughs face severe headwinds as a result of misguided or antiquated federal policies.
One new information and communication technologies — profiled in” They Say It Can’t Be Done ,” a brand-new programme on the relationship between inventors and the rules of procedure — is an artificial tree developed by Arizona State University physicist and operator Klaus Lackner. These man-made trees contain a special plastic resin that can absorb carbon dioxide and exhaust it when submerged in irrigate. They’re 1,000 times more effective at taking in carbon dioxide from the air than natural trees. Once captured, this carbon dioxide can then be reclaimed and converted into fuel.
Lackner’s pattern could be scaled to produce groups that each remove a metric ton of carbon dioxide daily. The prime stumbling block is the lack of clear regulations surrounding carbon capture engineerings — exclusively the transport and storage of captivated carbon.
Until a costume federal structure exists, the process of delivering information and communication technologies to grocery will remain impossibly involved and fraught with risk.
Or consider engineerings that could be used to increase the need for large-scale livestock farming. Raising billions of chickens, swine and cattle asks vast amounts of ocean, feed and arrive. The arising carbon footprint is massive — about 7. 1 gigatons of greenhouse gases a year.
Here more, new technologies could help reduce emissions. Researchers are designing cell-cultured meat — chicken, pork and beef produced in the lab rather than the feedlot. This lab-grown protein is safe, healthy and far less carbon-intensive than traditionally farmed meat.
One startup that compiles lab-grown meat, Eat Just, recently secured approval to sell its cell-cultured chicken in Singapore. But it’s still waiting on the green light from U.S. regulators. According to the firm’s founder, it could be another year — or more — before U.S. favor comes through.
For an manufacture as capital-intensive as cultured flesh product, this sluggish approbation process can make it impossible for a startup to launch and get wise concoctions to market.
High-tech answers like these are precisely what’s required to protect our planet from the threat of climate change. While it was unable to is whether lab-grown meat is the future of sustainable food or if artificial trees are the best solution for sequestering atmospheric carbon, an accessible and elevation regulatory playing field allows the best inventions to thrive.
Too numerous Americans believe that when it comes to climate change, only the government is up to the task. The fact is, the prime barricade to large-scale adoption of sustainable engineerings isn’t a lack of government collaboration, but too much — or at least the wrong kind.
In order to make good on his promise to reduce the nation’s carbon footprint, the president and his team will need to recognize how authority inhibits the proliferation and deployment of technology that can fulfill that promise.
Read more: feedproxy.google.com